The claim: Snakes dislocate or unhinge their jaws to swallow large prey.
What the evidence says: Nothing dislocates. The two halves of a snake's lower jaw are not fused at the front as in mammals but joined by an elastic ligament, so they can move independently and spread apart; the quadrate bones add further mobility. The jaw is doing exactly what it evolved to do, within its normal range of motion. 'Unhinging' describes an injury, not the mechanism.
Why it persists: The visual result looks like a dislocation, and the phrase is vivid and short.
Where you'll meet it: Nature documentaries and textbooks · Almost universal in popular science writing
Sources (1)
Academic bookCundall, David, Greene, Harry W. (2000)
Feeding in snakesFeeding: Form, Function and Evolution in Tetrapod Vertebrates, Academic Presspp. 293-333
The claim: The snake universally symbolises evil, deceit and temptation.
What the evidence says: This reading is specifically Abrahamic and is not general. In the Greek cult of Asklepios live snakes were kept in healing sanctuaries and the serpent-entwined staff is still the emblem of medicine. For the Hopi, snakes are associated with water and rain and are petitioned in ceremony. Elsewhere serpents appear as creators, ancestors and guardians. Treating the Genesis reading as the snake's meaning promotes one tradition to a universal.
Why it persists: Genesis is foundational to the cultures that produced most English-language symbolism writing, which makes the association invisible as a cultural specific rather than obviously one reading among many.
Where you'll meet it: Western culture broadly, following the Genesis account · Popular symbolism guides presenting this as the snake's meaning
Sources (2)
Academic bookEdelstein, Emma J., Edelstein, Ludwig (1945)
Asclepius: A Collection and Interpretation of the TestimoniesJohns Hopkins University Presspp. 139-180EthnographyFewkes, Jesse Walter (1897)
Tusayan Snake CeremoniesSixteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnologypp. 267-284