The claim: Dolphins have names and language, and talk to each other the way people do.
What the evidence says: 'Name' is defensible in a precise sense and was contested for decades before it was earned: the signature whistle is a learned, arbitrary, individually specific label that dolphins use to address one another, and identity survives having all voice cues removed. But that is a long way from language. There is no evidence of syntax, and the older sceptical position — that whistles were simply a byproduct of individual voice — was answered by experiment, not by enthusiasm. Calling it a name is fair; calling it a language is not.
Why it persists: The finding is genuinely remarkable, which makes the overstatement easy: 'dolphins have names' is true in a careful sense and gets repeated without the care.
Where you'll meet it: Popular science and documentary coverage · New Age writing about interspecies communication
Sources (2)
- Peer reviewedJanik, Vincent M., Sayigh, Laela S. (2013)Communication in bottlenose dolphins: 50 years of signature whistle researchJournal of Comparative Physiology A, vol. 199pp. 479-489Open source
- Peer reviewedJanik, Vincent M., Sayigh, Laela S., Wells, Randall S. (2006)Signature whistle shape conveys identity information to bottlenose dolphinsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 103pp. 8293-8297Open source